Let's put an end to the constant comparison of their beauty and the ongoing accusations of colorism.
Initially, some might argue that colorism is the reason why Aishwarya Rai is considered the most beautiful woman. However, this isn't entirely accurate. Take Madhuri, for instance, and many others before and after her, like Sonali. Each person has unique features that set them apart. Madhuri, for example, is a talented actress and superstar, but her beauty differs from Aishwarya's. While I find Madhuri beautiful, Aishwarya's beauty is particularly striking.
You can't attribute Aishwarya's beauty and aura solely to her light skin and colored eyes. I believe her role in Devdas was a game-changer, not only launching her global career but also establishing her as a timeless beauty icon, forever associated with traditional Indian beauty and dance.
Moving on to Bipasha, I think she's had her fair share of fame based on her potential. You can't ignore all the factors and attribute her lack of success solely to colorism. It didn't take long for her to face stiff competition from Priyanka, who's also a Miss World and a better actress and dancer. When you have two people with the same qualifications, you naturally choose the best one.
Bipasha went from being a star who could demand that producers cast her boyfriend alongside her to simply being John Abraham's girlfriend after he became a big star. She lost films due to his differences with Salman or other reasons.
Lastly, there's Katrina. While I acknowledge the Salman factor in her career, you can't reduce her to just being a white woman. She was genuinely beautiful, and at some point, she managed to outshine Priyanka and Kareena, who are better actresses. Additionally, Salman couldn't garner the same level of love and acceptance from the audience for any other actress he launched or supported.
Initially, some might argue that colorism is the reason why Aishwarya Rai is considered the most beautiful woman. However, this isn't entirely accurate. Take Madhuri, for instance, and many others before and after her, like Sonali. Each person has unique features that set them apart. Madhuri, for example, is a talented actress and superstar, but her beauty differs from Aishwarya's. While I find Madhuri beautiful, Aishwarya's beauty is particularly striking.
You can't attribute Aishwarya's beauty and aura solely to her light skin and colored eyes. I believe her role in Devdas was a game-changer, not only launching her global career but also establishing her as a timeless beauty icon, forever associated with traditional Indian beauty and dance.
Moving on to Bipasha, I think she's had her fair share of fame based on her potential. You can't ignore all the factors and attribute her lack of success solely to colorism. It didn't take long for her to face stiff competition from Priyanka, who's also a Miss World and a better actress and dancer. When you have two people with the same qualifications, you naturally choose the best one.
Bipasha went from being a star who could demand that producers cast her boyfriend alongside her to simply being John Abraham's girlfriend after he became a big star. She lost films due to his differences with Salman or other reasons.
Lastly, there's Katrina. While I acknowledge the Salman factor in her career, you can't reduce her to just being a white woman. She was genuinely beautiful, and at some point, she managed to outshine Priyanka and Kareena, who are better actresses. Additionally, Salman couldn't garner the same level of love and acceptance from the audience for any other actress he launched or supported.